Slip and Fall Accidents on New Jersey Property
Request a Free ConsultationIf you were injured in a slip and fall accident on someone else’s property in New Jersey, understanding premises liability law is critical to determining whether the property owner is legally responsible. Property owners don’t owe everyone the same duty of care; your legal status as a visitor determines the duty owed and whether it was breached, and speaking with a New Jersey slip and fall lawyer can help you sort out those duties and evaluate the strength of your claim.
New Jersey premises liability law depends on why you were on the property and what hazard caused your fall, as well as what evidence can prove the property owner’s negligence.
Key Takeaways for Liability for Slip and Fall Accidents in NJ
- Duty of care varies by visitor status: Property owners owe the highest duty to invitees (customers, tenants), moderate duty to licensees (social guests), and minimal duty to trespassers.
- Invitees receive maximum protection: Property owners must inspect, discover hazards, warn, and repair dangerous conditions for customers and business visitors.
- Notice is critical: You must prove the property owner knew or should have known about the hazard through actual notice or constructive notice based on duration.
- New Jersey has specific snow and ice rules: Under the ‘ongoing storm’ doctrine, property owners generally have no duty to remove accumulating snow or ice during an active storm but must act within a reasonable time after it ends.
- Comparative negligence applies: You can recover if less than 51% at fault under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1, with damages reduced by your percentage of fault.
Understanding Duty of Care: Three Categories of Visitors
Property owners in New Jersey owe a “duty of care” to people on their property—a legal obligation to maintain reasonably safe conditions. The extent of this duty varies dramatically depending on why you were on the property. New Jersey law divides visitors into three categories: invitees (highest duty), licensees (moderate duty), and trespassers (minimal duty), and this framework helps explain what conditions cause slip and fall accidents and when a property owner’s negligence becomes legally significant.
These categories arise from New Jersey case law, notably Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426 (1993), which outlines these duties. New Jersey courts increasingly apply general negligence principles to all premises liability cases, while traditional visitor classifications still guide many lawsuits.
Invitees: Highest Duty of Care
Invitees receive the highest level of protection. You’re an invitee if you were invited onto property for a purpose related to the owner’s business or mutual benefit. This category includes customers in stores and restaurants, tenants in apartment common areas, patients in medical offices, and delivery or repair workers.
Property owners must conduct regular, reasonable inspections to discover hazards. They must identify hidden dangers, even if not obvious. They must warn invitees of non-obvious dangers with adequate signage or verbal warnings. They must repair dangerous conditions or make them safe. Owners cannot ignore hazards; they must identify and fix them.
A grocery store must regularly inspect aisles for spills, fix damaged flooring, and maintain adequate lighting. An apartment landlord must maintain stairways, hallways, and parking lots while providing adequate lighting. A restaurant must inspect dining areas, restrooms, and entrances for hazards.
Licensees: Moderate Duty of Care
Licensees are on the property for their own purposes with the owner’s permission. This category includes social guests at private homes, friends invited to dinner parties, and people using property as a shortcut with permission.
Owners have no duty to inspect or repair for licensees but must warn of known hidden dangers. Key distinction: owners must warn licensees of known dangers but are not required to inspect to discover them. For invitees, owners must both discover and warn or fix. Consider this example: a homeowner knows the basement stairs are rickety. A social guest asks to get something from the basement. The homeowner must warn the guest about rickety stairs. However, if the homeowner doesn’t know the stairs are rickety, there’s no duty to inspect and discover the problem.
Trespassers: Minimal Duty
Trespassers are uninvited persons or those who exceed the scope of their invitation. Property owners owe trespassers very limited duty. They have no duty to make property safe for trespassers, but cannot intentionally harm trespassers or set traps.
Under the attractive nuisance doctrine, landowners may owe a heightened duty to trespassing children drawn to hazards such as pools or construction sites. Most slip and fall cases don’t involve trespassers. If you’re a customer, tenant, or invited guest, you’re likely an invitee or licensee with higher protections.
Common Slip and Fall Scenarios in New Jersey
Slip and fall claims often arise in predictable settings. The examples below illustrate how courts assess duty, notice, and causation and which evidence is most important, which is why understanding slip and fall accidents on New Jersey property helps clarify how liability is determined and what proof strengthens a claim.
Icy Sidewalks and Parking Lots
Elizabeth parks in the lot and walks to a retail store entrance. The temperature dropped overnight, creating black ice on the walkway. No salt or sand was applied. Elizabeth slips on ice, falls, and breaks her hip.
Elizabeth is an invitee—a customer entering business premises. The owner owes the highest duty to inspect, discover, warn, and remedy hazards. Ice formed overnight, allowing time to discover and address it.
The owner breached their duty by not inspecting the walkway, not applying salt or sand, and not warning customers. The property owner may raise the “ongoing storm” defense, but the storm ended eight or more hours prior, providing reasonable time to address the hazard.
Under the ‘ongoing storm’ doctrine, owners generally have no duty to remove accumulating snow or ice during an active storm but must act within a reasonable time after it ends. After a storm ends, property owners have a reasonable time—depending on storm duration, conditions, and property use—to remove snow and ice. Courts determine ‘reasonable time’ based on circumstances rather than a set hour range.
Wet Floors in Retail Stores
David is shopping at a supermarket. An employee mopped Aisle 3 fifteen minutes ago but placed no warning signs. David turns into the aisle, does not see the wet floor, slips, and injures his back.
David is an invitee as a customer. The store created the condition when an employee mopped, giving the store actual knowledge that the floor was wet. The store breached its duty by failing to place warning signs, failing to block the aisle until the floor dried, and creating a hazardous condition without adequate safeguards.
The store may argue the wet floor was “open and obvious,” but wet floors aren’t always obvious, especially if the floor is normally shiny. Owners may still be liable for obvious hazards if it is reasonably foreseeable that invitees could be distracted or unable to avoid them. This represents a very strong liability case where the store created the hazard with actual knowledge yet failed to warn customers.
Poorly Lit Stairwells in Apartment Buildings
Linda, a tenant, uses the interior stairwell to reach her unit. Several ceiling lights are burned out, creating very dim conditions. She misses a step due to poor visibility, falls down the stairs, and suffers a head injury and a wrist fracture.
Linda is an invitee as a tenant using common areas. The landlord has a duty to maintain common areas in safe condition, including hallways and stairwells. The lights were burned out for weeks, and multiple tenants complained, establishing actual notice.
The landlord breached their duty by failing to replace bulbs despite complaints and allowing inadequate lighting that created dangerous conditions. The inadequate lighting directly caused her to miss the step. Evidence showing weeks of complaints refutes any argument that the lights just burned out recently.
Uneven Sidewalks and Parking Lot Defects
Michael walks on a public sidewalk in front of a commercial property. Tree roots have caused a two-inch lip in the concrete. Michael’s foot catches on the raised section, he trips and falls, suffering a broken wrist. This type of scenario often becomes a slip and fall accident case when the defect developed over time and the property owner should have discovered and repaired it through routine inspections.
The condition developed over years as tree roots gradually raised the slab and deterioration became visible. The property owner should have discovered the defect through routine inspection, establishing constructive notice. The owner breached their duty by not inspecting and discovering the defect, not repairing the raised concrete, and not warning pedestrians.
In many New Jersey municipalities, commercial property owners are responsible for maintaining abutting sidewalks, while residential homeowners may have limited or no liability unless a local ordinance imposes it. The “open and obvious” defense may argue that the two-inch lip was visible, but even obvious defects may create liability if the owner should have repaired them.
Proving Property Owner Liability in New Jersey
To establish liability for a slip and fall accident, you must prove five essential elements:
- Dangerous conditions existed (e.g., ice, liquid, defect, inadequate lighting), supported by photos, witness statements, reports, and inspection records
- Notice to the owner (actual or constructive), shown by complaints, creation of the condition, employee observation, hazard duration, or video. Constructive notice requires showing the hazardous condition existed long enough for property owners, exercising reasonable care, to have discovered and remedied it (often several hours or days)
- Failure to act despite notice—no repair, warning, or mitigation
- Causation linking the hazard to your fall (testimony, witnesses, substance on shoes/clothes, medical records)
- Damages proved by medical bills, imaging, treatment records, wage loss, and injury photos
Property Owner Defenses and Counter-Arguments
Owners often raise the ‘open and obvious’ defense, claiming the hazard was obvious and should have been avoided. New Jersey limits this defense—even obvious hazards may create liability. Courts evaluate whether it was reasonable under the circumstances for the plaintiff to avoid the hazard. A hazard may seem obvious in hindsight but not while walking, and you may have had good reasons for not avoiding it, such as carrying items or escorting a child. These practical realities show why slip-and-fall accidents ruin the season for many victims who are blamed unfairly despite dangerous conditions the property owner should have addressed.
Comparative negligence arguments may assert you were partly at fault—for inattention, improper footwear, distraction, ignoring warnings, or not using an alternative route. Counter-arguments emphasize that the property owner’s breach was the primary cause, your conduct was reasonable given circumstances, and you can still recover if you are found less than 51% responsible under New Jersey’s comparative negligence rule. If your fault exceeds 50%, recovery is barred entirely.
“No notice” defenses claim the hazard just occurred with no time to discover and fix it. Counter-arguments include evidence showing hazard duration through witnesses, video, or worn appearance; inadequate inspection schedules; and situations where property owners created the hazard through mopping or snow removal.
Steps to Protect Your Rights After a Slip and Fall
After a fall, take these steps to protect your rights and preserve evidence:
- Photograph the hazard, injuries, footwear, surrounding area, and weather if possible; write down location, time, and witnesses; request and keep the incident report; preserve clothing/footwear
- Seek prompt medical care and tell providers how you fell; collect witness contact information; request surveillance video immediately (many systems overwrite in 30–90 days)
- Contact a New Jersey premises liability attorney quickly; evidence disappears and N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2 sets a two-year filing deadline
Evidence disappears quickly: surveillance footage is deleted, hazards are repaired, and memories fade. Acting promptly protects your ability to prove liability and recover compensation.
FAQ for Liability for Slip and Fall Accidents on NJ Property
Is a property owner liable for ice on the sidewalk in New Jersey?
Property owners may be liable for ice on sidewalks depending on timing and circumstances. Under the ‘ongoing storm’ doctrine, property owners generally have no duty to remove accumulating snow or ice during an active storm but must act within a reasonable time after it ends. Many New Jersey municipalities require commercial property owners to maintain abutting sidewalks.
How do I prove the property owner knew about a hazard?
You can prove knowledge through actual notice (property owner knew about the condition) or constructive notice (condition existed for such a length of time or under such circumstances that the property owner, in exercising reasonable care, should have discovered and remedied it). Actual notice evidence includes prior complaints, maintenance records, or employee observations. Constructive notice evidence includes hazard duration, worn appearance, witness testimony, or surveillance video showing the condition over time.
Can I recover if I was partially at fault for my slip and fall?
Yes. New Jersey follows modified comparative negligence under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1. You can recover if you were 50% or less at fault, with your damages reduced by your percentage of fault. If you were 51% or more at fault, you cannot recover. Even if you were somewhat inattentive, you may still recover substantial compensation if the property owner’s negligence was the primary cause.
How long must businesses keep surveillance video after a fall?
Many systems overwrite within 30–90 days. Ask the owner in writing to preserve relevant footage immediately; your attorney can send a preservation letter. Waiting too long means critical video evidence may be permanently lost, making it harder to prove what happened and how long the hazard existed.
Do special rules apply if the property is owned by a public entity?
Yes. Claims against public entities may require strict notice under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (generally 90 days). Missing notice deadlines can bar the claim; consult counsel promptly. Public entity cases have unique procedural requirements and shorter deadlines than claims against private property owners.
Get Help With Your New Jersey Slip and Fall Case
New Jersey premises liability law determines when property owners are liable for slip and fall accidents based on your visitor status and the duty of care owed. Our attorneys have extensive experience handling premises liability cases throughout New Jersey. We understand duty of care standards, know how to prove property owner negligence, and fight to overcome common defenses.
Evidence disappears quickly in slip and fall cases. Surveillance footage is deleted, hazards are repaired, and memories fade. Contact us immediately to preserve evidence and protect your rights. We offer free consultations and charge no fees unless we recover compensation.
If we can help, we will. Call (856) 548-8347 today for your free case evaluation. We have offices throughout South Jersey to serve you, and evening and weekend appointments are available.